Importation

What’s Hot … The New World Screwworm Impact on Fanciers

 

Kelly Crouch, CFA Legislative Information Liaison

The New World Screwworm (NWS) infestation in Texas and New Mexico will impact fanciers traveling to U.S. shows or traveling with pets for any reason. Most states and the federal government have implemented rules on pet travel. Minnesota’s restrictions start with the common ones, but the state adds additional mandates on top of them (see below). Even Texas, with the most screwworm cases, has implemented travel restrictions for animals in and around the infested counties. Complicating matters further, some local governments, such as Palm Beach County, Florida, are considering or have implemented restrictions on pets traveling to or through their jurisdictions. The U.S. eradicated the screwworm in 1966, and a small outbreak in Florida in 2017, so this will be completely new to many of us.

The NWS fly lays eggs in open wounds or in the mouth, nose, and ears of warm-blooded animals, including humans. Of the 39 cases detected, three have been in dogs. None have been detected in cats yet. Infestations spread most widely through eggs laid on hosts and developing pupae. These maggots are more dangerous than others because they feed on live tissue, which can cause secondary bacterial infections or even death. Most fly larvae feed on dead tissue.

Understandably, states and localities that are not yet affected by the NWS want to remain that way. Show managers and fanciers need to understand these laws will vary from place to place. Some restrictions use the term ‘import’, but since an infected animal that is only passing through or staying temporarily can cause new infestations, one wonders whether the term is defined more broadly than usual in those cases. While the police could inspect animals in cars, it is more likely fanciers will run into hotels and airlines requiring proof that any animals they are traveling with are Screwworm-free. Animal control may also visit shows to require proof, much like they sometimes do with rabies vaccinations.

The only way to stop infestations is with sterilized flies. It takes time to sterilize enough flies to stop the infestation, and it will be months before a facility can produce sterilized flies in large quantities. Thus, the problem and the restrictions will be here for some time. Hopefully, fanciers will not have to deal with an NWS infection; however, Texas A&M University has an article on detecting and preventing infections here. The American Veterinary Medical Association has information on treating NWS. Examine your pets frequently and treat all wounds and umbilical cords with approved insecticides. Given the small number of NWS cases, fanciers should not fear attending shows in uninfected areas, but should include NWS travel preparedness in their travel plans and decisions. Links to the federal website and state resources with active NWS restrictions are available here. Local jurisdictions are not listed but should be checked for pet travel requirements. As this is a developing situation, more jurisdictions may implement or change their own programs to supplement federal requirements.

Minnesota Board of Animal Health Import Restrictions for NWS:

“Minnesota Import Requirements for Dogs and Cats Entering from States with New World Screwworm (NWS) Infestations and Endemic Areas:

  • Animals from USDA-designated active NWS sites will not be allowed import to Minnesota. The Board of Animal Health will allow imports from states with USDA-active cases if they meet all import requirements outlined in this policy.
  • A Certificate of Veterinary Inspection (CVI) must be issued by an accredited veterinarian within 72 hours prior to transport. The CVI is valid for seven days from the date of issuance. The CVI must include the USDA-required certification attesting the animal has been inspected and determined to be free of NWS and that all applicable NWS import requirements have been satisfied.
  • Email a valid rabies vaccination certificate or pet passport to pet. travel.bah@state.mn.us no later than three days before the animal’s arrival in Minnesota.
  • An EPA- or FDA-approved NWS treatment must be administered to dogs and cats following the manufacturers’ dosing guidelines. The product name, dosage and date of treatment must be listed on the CVI and also emailed to pet.travel.bah@state.mn.us within five days of departure.
  • All animals will be quarantined for a minimum of five days upon arrival in Minnesota. Board of Animal Health staff will verify the quarantine is being followed and confirm quarantine release details.
  • Animals that do not meet import requirements will be quarantined for a minimum of 10 days and must be examined by a licensed veterinarian, who must confirm in writing that the animal is free of NWS and note the exam date.
  • Immediately notify pet.travel.bah@state.mn.us if any signs of NWS develop during quarantine.”

What’s Hot … Mid-session Updates: FL, GA, HI, IA, and MD

 

Kelly Crouch, CFA Legislative Information Liaison

Florida
There have been many attempts over the past 29 years to regulate dog breeders in the state. Once again, those efforts died when SB 1356 and HB 1521 failed to progress.
Senate Bill 1004 amends the consumer protection laws governing pet sales and animal cruelty. It has been enrolled and sent to the governor. If enacted, the pet dealer threshold is raised to selling more than three litters or 30 dogs or cats per year, record-
keeping requirements are added for all pet dealers, and best management practices are established for dog breeders. The bill was signed by the governor.

Georgia
Senate Bill 590 would have expanded regulations on dog breeders had it been enacted. Cat breeders would not have been impacted. Georgia has one of the most restrictive cat and dog breeder laws in the country. Fortunately, the bill died and will not carry over into 2027.

Hawaii
Several bills were introduced in Hawaii that would have burdened cat and dog breeders. House Bill
1594 and SB 3012 would prohibit intact cats and dogs from being imported unless the breeder was registered with the
Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity. House Bill 1736-2 would establish a spay/neuter fund at the cost of mandating the sterilization of all cats. Any free-roaming cats caught and sterilized could only be placed in sanctuaries. Fortunately, all these bills died and will not carry over to 2027. Fanciers should expect renewed efforts in 2027.

Iowa
Senate Bill 2306 would have subjected “commercial” breeders to inspection. It would have defined a commercial breeder as “a
person, engaged in the business of breeding dogs or cats, who sells, exchanges, or leases dogs or cats in return for consideration, or who offers to do so, whether or not the animals are raised, trained, groomed, or boarded by the person. A person who owns or harbors three or fewer breeding males or females is not a commercial breeder.” It died.

Maryland
House Bill 1551 died when the legislature adjourned. The bill would have established the Dog Breeder Accountability
Fund and imposed mandates on dog breeders, including requiring that every puppy be issued a birth certificate by the state.

What’s Hot … European Union Welfare of Dogs and Cats and Their Traceability Legislation is Informally Approved

 

Kelly Crouch, CFA Legislative Information Liaison

The Welfare of Dogs and Cats and Their Traceability Legislation is one large step closer to becoming law. Originally proposed in 2023, the legislation will impact fanciers, breeders, pet sellers, animal shelters, and pet owners across the European Union. It creates standards for breeding, housing, traceability, import, and handling of cats and dogs.

The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union negotiated hundreds of amendments to the act. They approved the legislation in an informal plenary vote, with 558 in favor, 35 against, and 52 abstentions (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20251121IPR31539/protection-of-dogs-and-cats-deal-on-eu-rules-to-stop-abuse). The first EU-wide animal law needs only to be adopted by the Council to be enforced.

Provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Breeding between parents and offspring, grandparents with grandchildren, and between siblings and half-siblings will be prohibited.
  • Breeding cats and dogs to cause exaggerated or excessive physical traits that “lead to significant health risks” is also banned.
  • Animals with such traits or that are “mutilated” cannot be used in shows, exhibitions, or competitions.
  • Mandatory microchipping and registration in a national database of all cats and dogs in the EU.
  • Imported cats and dogs, whether for sale or not, must be microchipped and registered in a national database.
  • National databases within the EU must be interoperable.

Member States are responsible for enforcement, but may have more restrictive laws if they so desire.

LEGIS ALERT AND UPDATE: Hawaii SB 3012, HB 1736-1, and HB 1594

 

Hawaiian fanciers need to speak up to avoid the creation of a breeder registry and mandatory spay/neuter for cats. The good news is that House Bill 1594 was deferred. Unfortunately, its companion bill, SB 3012,  has been scheduled for a hearing on Monday, February 9, 2026, at 4:00 p.m. The Hawaiian Humane Society has been pushing for anti-breeder legislation for several years in various ways. Fanciers need to help make sure the losing streak continues. Please OPPOSE both bills!

Senate Bill 3012 ( https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=SB&billnumber=3012&year=2026 ) would prohibit the importation of any intact cat or dog, and it shares the same objections as the deferred HB 1594. It includes an exception for cats and dogs imported by breeders registered with the Department of Agriculture and Biosecurity. The statute requires the agency to create a registry that, at a minimum, includes the breeder’s name, business address, and the species or breeds maintained. At first glance, that may not seem so bad; however, the agency could take it much farther. Bengals became illegal in Hawaii after that agency was given discretion to determine which animals would be prohibited in the state. This may not happen, but it is easier to amend an existing law or regulation than get a new one enacted. It is also a well-established strategy of animal rights groups to get anything passed and change it later to what they really want.

Further, when you combine the facts that most cats and dogs are sterilized and that people who cannot afford to sterilize their animals most likely cannot afford to live in Hawaii, this law makes no sense. Also, no Hawaiian show breeder can maintain genetic diversity over the long term without introducing new animals. Eventually, those will have to come from outside Hawaii. The rationale for this bill is to address rabies control and pet overpopulation. An animal’s breeding status has nothing to do with rabies control. Also, a breeder registry will do little to help with stray or feral cats and dogs. Pedigreed cats make up 3-5% of the cat population. There are also far more random-bred dogs than purebred dogs. It is not to the benefit of any show breeder to allow their animals to roam at large or contribute to the random-bred animal population. Pets placed by show breeders are typically sterilized prior to placement or are required to be sterilized under their contracts. They are not contributing to the problem! Why punish responsible breeders and burden the state with unnecessary regulation? If the “solution” does little to address the issue, why subject breeders to the expense of breeder registration and the risks associated with a publicly available registry? Fanciers can submit written testimony at the bill link above.

House Bill 1736-1 ( https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=1736&year=2026 ) would establish a spay/neuter fund for cat sterilizations and mandatory spay/neuter for cats. There are studies that early sterilization can be detrimental to both cats and dogs. Also, with the veterinary shortage experienced throughout the country, people often have to wait long periods before sterilization can be performed. Sixty days may not be sufficient, particularly if the owner relies on low-cost alternatives. And, while it includes an exception for cats registered with a breed registry, that too is problematic and unnecessary. The amended version of the exception reads:

“(3)  The owner of the cat can provide verifiable proof upon request by the applicable county animal control authority that the cat is approved by and registered with a national or international breed registry or association that, at minimum, requires verification of:

          (A)  Breed;

          (B)  Date of birth;

          (C)  Name of the registered sire and dam;

          (D)  Name of the breeder; and

          (E)  Other information related to breeding, transfer or ownership, and death.

     (c)  Any person violating this section shall be fined no less than $500 and no more than $1,000 per violation per cat.

     (d)  This section shall not apply to cats brought into the state exclusively for the purpose of entering the cats in a cat show or exhibition and not allowed to run at large.”

The amended version removes the requirement to show the cat. Still, this provision burdens cat breeders unnecessarily, may hinder the development of new breeds, while doing nothing to reduce the number of community cats. It is wholly unnecessary to the creation of a spay/neuter fund, which most breeders would support if it did not also make participating in their hobby more difficult. Pedigreed cat and purebred dog breeders are frequently involved in rescue efforts, either directly or through contributions. This benefits the state. Establishing a spay/neuter fund is a laudable goal and will do far more to reduce the number of community cats (or feral dogs) than mandatory spay/neuter. The fund will help people who cannot afford today’s veterinary costs and who would ignore such a law out of financial necessity, as well as people involved in community cat programs. Burdening breeders will not.

The Committee on Judiciary & Hawaiian Affairs has scheduled a hearing for HB 1736-1 on Tuesday, 02/10/2026, at 2:00 p.m.

We need all Hawaii fanciers to oppose these bills, especially with the support of the Hawaiian Humane Society, the Kauaʻi Humane Society, the Department of Land and Natural Resources, and the Animal Legal Defense Fund. Fanciers can submit their testimony online at the links above. If you can, attend the public hearings as well.

Kelly Crouch

CFA Legislative Information Liaison

You are the eyes, ears, and voice of the fancy!Is detrimental legislation happening in your area? Please let us know. Contact the CFA Legislative Group at legislation@cfa.org

LEGIS ALERT: Hawaii Considers MSN for cats, any cats and dogs imported into the state, and a breeder registry

 

Please act now! Testimony can be submitted on the bill web pages included below until 9 a.m. on 2/3/2026. If you can, please attend the hearing to submit written or oral testimony. On Wednesday, February 4, at 9 a.m., the Hawaii House Committee on Agriculture and Food Systems will hear HB 1594 and HB 1736, both of which could have devastating consequences for local fanciers. These bills were introduced to address the pet overpopulation and community cat issues. Both are supported by the Hawaiian Humane Society.

HB 1594 ( https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=1594 ) would require that all dogs and cats brought into the state be sterilized unless they are too infirm, are in the state for less than 90 days, or the importer is registered as a breeder with the department. In essence, this is a breeder registry for all breeders, as few breeders (in any state) can maintain a breeding program without occasionally bringing in animals from another state. 

HB 1736 ( https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session/measure_indiv.aspx?billtype=HB&billnumber=1736 ) would mandate that all cats five months of age or older be sterilized and prohibit any unsterilized cat from being imported into Hawaii, subject to certain exceptions. One exception applies to cats that meet the cat association registry and exhibition requirements. The bill would not apply to cats temporarily entering the state for the purpose of exhibition and cat shows.

Pedigreed cats make up only 3-5% of the cat population. They do not contribute to the random-bred community cat issues that Hawaii may be experiencing. Not only will these bills not address the issue as the proponents argue, but they will also be unnecessarily burdensome for the state and breeders alike.

Remote testimony guidelines can be found at chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/docs/RemoteTestimonyHouseGuidelines.pdf

Hawaii has a very short legislative session, so things tend to move very quickly and with little notice. Please contact the CFA Legislative Committee if you want to help defeat misguided legislation. You are the eyes, ears, and voice of the fancy! 

Scroll to Top